You are not a member of this team. If you want to be part of this team, click on 'Subscribe to this team'.
Team(s):
Type:
Website bug
Status:
Open
Priority:
Normal
Description:
In 1.0 there was a rule implemented that from status S3, T1 and up an edoovillage MUST be assigned. But in 2.0 it is possible to set dootronics to status T1 without having assigned an edoovillage, e.g. https://www.labdoo.org/content/000005916 (was corrected in the meantime, but you can check the revisions). An address was assigned and a dootrip, but no edoovillage.
Комментарии
2.0 acts the same way as 1.0
2.0 acts the same way as 1.0 regarding edoovillage assignment policies and dootronic status. I am attaching a screenshot, you will see that if we try to remove the edoovillage and click on 'save' while the dootronic is in status T1, the system will not allow you to do so.
I don't know how dootronic 000005916 got in that state, i do see it in the revision as you say: https://www.labdoo.org/node/21470/revisions/25851/view . In the second attached screenshot, you will see that if you mark status T1, automatically the edoovillage field becomes mandatory.
Was the dootronic cloned or manually created?
screenshot_from_2015-12-18_085121.png
screenshot_from_2015-12-18_085440.png